How does pricing work?

One flat price per workspace, not per seat. Free: 1 private repo, 1 mini-audit per month, verified fixes, no card. Pro: $30/mo with $30 of usage included, up to 3 repos, full audit pipeline, opt-in overage after. Team: $200/mo flat with $200 of usage included, unlimited repos and seats. Included usage does not roll over.

What do I get with Pro vs Team?

Pro: up to 3 repos, the full audit + scan pipeline, PR reviews on every opened PR, and auto-publish to Linear. Team: unlimited repos and seats, learning from your accepted fixes, and public repos by URL.

What is the 13-step verification?

Before a PR ships, every fix has to pass 13 checks: the tests it started with, the tests after the change, the build, lint and formatting, a size limit on the diff, a second review by an independent agent, and a re-scan to confirm the original issue is gone. If a critical check fails, the fix never becomes a PR.

How is Hyrax different from AI coding assistants?

Coding assistants help write code faster. Hyrax is the independent layer that reviews what they produce: it audits issues, fixes them, and ships PRs for engineers to review and merge. Different category, different outcome.

Scan reads the whole codebase first, so it understands your architecture and conventions, then looks for problems the way a reviewer would. It produces a ranked list of findings and easy wins, each with a plan for the fix.

Every change ships as a pull request with the [Hyrax] prefix. PR Review reviews every opened pull request automatically against the codebase conventions, leaving comments that update as the code changes. It can block merge on must-fix findings. Available on Pro and Team.

What languages are supported?

Hyrax works across 19 languages: Python, TypeScript, JavaScript, Go, Rust, Swift, Ruby, Java, Kotlin, C#, C++, C, PHP, Scala, Dart, Elixir, Shell, Lua, and MDX. It works with the frameworks built on them: React, Next.js, Vue, Svelte, Angular, Node.js, Django, Rails, Spring, FastAPI, Express, React Native, and Flutter.

What integrations are supported?

GitHub for source control. Linear for ticket management. Tickets are created on audit and closed automatically when fixes merge.

All inference runs in the Hyrax AWS Bedrock account. Hyrax does not train on customer code.

PRODUCT · AUGUST 13, 2026 · 6 MIN READ

Hyrax vs. Qodo, Cursor BugBot, and CodeRabbit: who originates the work

Q: What is Hyrax?

The independent review layer for AI coding. Hyrax audits the codebase, surfaces findings across security, correctness, maintainability, performance, architecture, and operations, then writes fixes and ships PRs. An engineer reviews and merges every PR.

PR review tools activate when a developer publishes a pull request. Hyrax audits the whole repository on its own schedule and ships its own fixes. The difference is who originates the work.

Every week someone asks some version of the same question: how is Hyrax different from Qodo, from Cursor BugBot, from CodeRabbit? The teams asking usually already pay for one of them. It is the right question, and the answer is not that those tools are bad at reviewing pull requests. They are good at it. The answer is that reviewing pull requests is the whole job for them, and only half the job for Hyrax.

The clean way to compare is to ask one question of each tool: who originates the work?

What PR review tools actually do#

Qodo, Cursor BugBot, and CodeRabbit share a shape. A developer publishes a pull request, the tool wakes up, analyzes the change, and posts findings. Within that shape, each has real strengths. Qodo reviews with full-repository context and can apply suggested fixes inside the PR. CodeRabbit's Autofix can commit fixes for its own findings to the PR branch. BugBot posts inline comments with suggested fixes for the diff under review.

Notice what every one of those sentences has in common: the pull request already exists. A developer wrote the code, decided it was ready, and asked for review. The tool improves what was already going to happen.

What never triggers them#

The code that most needs attention rarely arrives in a fresh pull request. It is already in main. The endpoint missing authorization that shipped eight months ago. The N+1 query that got slower as the table grew. The dependency pinned to a vulnerable version in a service nobody has touched since spring.

No pull request means no review. PR review tools are structurally blind to the existing codebase, not because their analysis is weak, but because nothing invokes it. The work has no originator.

What Hyrax does with that gap#

Hyrax audits the whole repository on its own schedule. A standard audit runs a focused 24-tool pass across security, correctness, maintainability, performance, and dependencies; a full audit runs the complete catalog of roughly 39 tools including architecture analysis. Findings come from main, not from whatever a developer happened to change this week.

Then Hyrax does the part that stops most findings from ever getting fixed: it writes the fix itself, in an isolated worktree, and runs it through 13 verification steps. Baseline tests, regression tests, build, lint, an independent reviewer agent, a post-fix audit, and a final check that the original finding is actually resolved. If any step fails, the fix is discarded and nothing ships. If every step passes, Hyrax ships the pull request and closes the Linear ticket behind it. Fixes never merge on their own; the team keeps control of the merge.

Hyrax also reviews every incoming pull request and posts a single review comment plus a check run. The PR-review job is covered. It is just not where the job ends.

The comparison in one table#

	Qodo	BugBot	CodeRabbit	Hyrax
Reviews incoming PRs	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Fixes inside an existing PR	Yes	Suggestions	Yes (Autofix)	Yes
Audits main without a PR	No	No	No	Yes
Originates its own fix PRs	No	No	No	Yes
Verifies fixes before shipping	n/a	n/a	n/a	13 steps
Closes tickets	No	No	No	Yes (Linear)

Where Claude Code and Cursor fit#

Coding agents are a different category, and "is Hyrax better than Claude Code" is a category error in both directions. A developer drives Claude Code or Cursor by hand, one session at a time, toward a goal the developer chose. Hyrax is the independent layer that checks the work, including the work those agents produced, without anyone driving it.

They compound rather than compete. Hyrax's Publish workflow writes each repository's discovered context back into the repo, so Claude Code, Cursor, and Copilot stop guessing at architecture and conventions. The agents write faster; Hyrax verifies what they wrote.

Where Snyk and SonarQube fit#

Scanners detect and gate, and they are good at it. Snyk's automated fix pull requests target vulnerable dependency upgrades. What scanners leave behind is application code: the logic bug, the missing check, the slow path. That is the work Hyrax finishes, with every fix passing the same 13 steps before a pull request ships.

Run the comparison instead of reading it#

A comparison page is an argument. An audit is evidence. The Free plan connects one private repo, runs a mini-audit, and returns up to 5 findings and 5 fixes as ready-to-merge pull requests, with no card required. Teams already paying for a PR review tool can run both side by side on the same repo and compare what each one surfaces.

app.hyrax.dev/signup

Ship clean code.