Aikido Security vs Hyrax

Aikido scans the stack.
Hyrax fixes the code.

Aikido is an all-in-one security platform — SAST, SCA, secrets, containers, IaC, and DAST in one dashboard with noise reduction. It surfaces and triages risk; code remediation is largely manual. Hyrax finds code issues and ships fixes verified against the test suite.

13verification steps
6audit categories
$0per-seat fees
hyrax/fix-session-timeout
Merge-ready

[Hyrax] Fix: refresh session token before expiry

hyrax-bot wants to merge · +24 −6

13 / 13 checks passed
Baseline test written
Type check
Unit + integration tests
Post-fix audit clean
CI pipeline confirmed
Closed HYRAX-214 · verified end-to-end, no Aikido Security handoff
Runs on AWS Bedrock
Code never trained on
13-step verification
Opens PRs, closes tickets
You approve every merge

The difference

Same surface area. Hyrax does the work.

Aikido Security
  • All-in-one scanning: SAST, SCA, secrets, containers, IaC, DAST
  • Noise reduction and risk triage across the stack
  • Surfaces and prioritizes — code fixes are largely manual
  • Per-contributor pricing above the free tier
Hyrax
  • Audits application code across six categories, then fixes it
  • 13-step verification with baseline tests before every fix
  • Native dependency, license, and supply-chain auditing included
  • Opens a [Hyrax] PR and closes the ticket — you approve the merge

Feature comparison

Everything Aikido Security does — plus the execution it doesn't.

Capability
Aikido Security
Hyrax
DetectionSAST scanning
Dependency scanning (SCA)
Secrets detection
Container / IaC / DAST
FixAutonomous fix execution
Validates fix against your test suite
Opens PR and closes ticket
PricingCompute credits included
Yes
Partial
No

The edge Aikido Security misses

A fix isn't done until it's verified.

Aikido Security stops at a suggestion or a scoped patch. Every Hyrax fix runs a 13-step verification before it can merge — baseline tests are established first, the fix is applied, and the full pipeline confirms nothing else broke. Nothing ships on trust.

13steps per fix
0unverified merges
01Isolated worktree
02Baseline tests
03Fix agent (convention-matched)
04Diff size guard (20 files / 2,000 lines)
05Test regression
06Build
07Auto-format
08Lint
09Cross-project test
10Scanner loop (scans its own fix)
11Review loop (second agent)
12Post-fix audit
13PR opened

Pricing

Transparent pricing. Compute included.

Aikido Security
Free / from ~$314/mo

Free tier for small teams. Paid plans priced per contributor, scaling with team size and add-on scanners.

Hyrax
Free1 private repo, mini-audit monthly. No card.
$0
ProUp to 3 repos, full audit pipeline, $30 of usage included.
$30/mo
TeamUnlimited repos, the learn loop, $200 of usage included.
$200/mo
  • Usage included each cycle
  • Whole-codebase audit, not just PRs
  • Autonomous verified fixes

FAQ

Questions about switching from Aikido Security.

They overlap on code scanning but differ in scope. Aikido covers the full stack including containers, IaC, and DAST. Hyrax focuses on application code and fixes it with verification. Many teams use both.

No. Hyrax does not scan container images, Terraform/IaC, or run DAST. It audits application code — SAST plus native dependency and supply-chain checks — and fixes what it finds.

Yes. That's the core difference. Aikido surfaces and triages risk; Hyrax makes the change in an isolated worktree, runs the test suite and build, and opens a [Hyrax] PR you approve.

Stop reviewing. Start shipping.

Connect a repository and get the first full audit in under 10 minutes.

Start free
No credit card to start
First audit in under 10 minutes
Code is never trained on
You approve every merge