Codex vs Hyrax
Agents like Codex generate more code than teams can review. Hyrax reviews the whole codebase, writes verified fixes, and creates merge-ready pull requests a human approves.
Hyrax runs on roughly 400 of our own repositories.
Free plan: a monthly mini audit, 5 findings, and up to 5 fixes at no cost.
hyrax-bot wants to merge · +24 −6
The difference
Feature comparison
The edge Codex misses
Codex stops at a suggestion or a scoped patch. Every Hyrax fix runs a 13-step verification before it can merge. Baseline tests are established first, the fix is applied, and the full pipeline confirms nothing else broke. Nothing ships on trust.
Pricing
Codex is available through ChatGPT paid plans and the OpenAI API, priced by subscription and token usage rather than a flat code-review fee.
FAQ
Not really. A coding agent like Codex generates code inside a session. Hyrax reviews and fixes the whole repository and creates verified pull requests. Many teams run both together.
Yes. Hyrax reviews every pull request and the wider codebase, including code written by a coding agent, then writes the fix and verifies it against the test suite before the pull request exists.
No. Hyrax does the review and writes the fix, but a person approves and merges every pull request. Hyrax never merges on its own.
Connect a repository and get the first full audit in under 10 minutes.