Qodana vs Hyrax
Qodana is JetBrains' static analysis engine, bringing IDE inspections into CI with quality gates across many languages. It reports problems; fixes happen back in the IDE. Hyrax finds issues and ships fixes verified against the test suite.
hyrax-bot wants to merge · +24 −6
The difference
Feature comparison
The edge Qodana misses
Qodana stops at a suggestion or a scoped patch. Every Hyrax fix runs a 13-step verification before it can merge — baseline tests are established first, the fix is applied, and the full pipeline confirms nothing else broke. Nothing ships on trust.
Pricing
Community linters are free. Ultimate and full-language analysis are licensed per developer, billed through JetBrains.
FAQ
You can run both. Qodana brings JetBrains inspections into CI. Hyrax fixes the issues those inspections surface, with verification, so they don't queue up for the next sprint.
No. Qodana is strongest inside the JetBrains ecosystem. Hyrax is editor-agnostic — it works at the repository level and the HYRAX.md context file is read by any IDE assistant.
Yes. Hyrax includes SAST-grade static analysis across 19 languages, then goes further by fixing issues autonomously through 13-step verification.
Connect a repository and get the first full audit in under 10 minutes.
Start free