Qodo suggests. Hyrax ships.

Every other tool leaves a comment.
Hyrax leaves it done.

Qodo focuses on test generation and PR review with multi-agent architecture. Fixes require developer approval with no CI validation. Hyrax executes autonomously with verified, tested fixes.

11verification gates
0developer handoff
$0markup on compute

Qodo vs Hyrax

Qodo
  • -Multi-agent PR review (Critical Issue, Breaking Changes, etc.)
  • -Test suggestions require manual fixes to run
  • -/improve suggests code via checkboxes — no CI validation
  • -48% bug detection rate (dev.to benchmark)
Hyrax
  • Executes fixes end-to-end autonomously
  • Tests written and validated before every fix
  • 11-gate verification including CI pipeline
  • Ships PRs without developer intervention

Feature comparison

Capability
Qodo
Hyrax
DetectionPR review comments
Full codebase scanning
TestsGenerates test suggestions
Tests run automatically
ExecutionAutonomous fix execution
CI validation before merge
Opens PR and closes ticket
PricingCompute credits included
Yes
No
Partial

Pricing comparison

Qodo
$30/user/mo

Per-seat. Credits for premium models. Free tier reduced from 75 to 30 reviews with no announcement.

Hyrax
$30/mo Pro
$60/seat/mo Team

All plans include compute credits.

Frequently asked questions

Yes. Qodo helps with test generation in your IDE. Hyrax handles autonomous fixing and continuous governance across your codebase.

Yes. Hyrax writes baseline tests before every fix and validates they pass after the fix. This is part of the 11-gate verification.

Kudelski Security disclosed prompt injection vulnerabilities in 2024 that could leak AWS credentials. Hyrax's architecture prevents prompt injection through isolated execution environments.

Stop reviewing.
Start shipping.

Get your first autonomous fix in under 10 minutes.

No credit card required.