Baz vs Hyrax
Baz runs reviewer and fixer agents that act on the pull requests and tickets you bring it. Hyrax audits the entire codebase proactively — surfacing issues before they reach a PR — and ships fixes through 13-step verification.
hyrax-bot wants to merge · +24 −6
The difference
Feature comparison
The edge Baz misses
Baz stops at a suggestion or a scoped patch. Every Hyrax fix runs a 13-step verification before it can merge — baseline tests are established first, the fix is applied, and the full pipeline confirms nothing else broke. Nothing ships on trust.
Pricing
Per active developer. Free tier: 50 PR reviews. Fixer usage metered; Enterprise adds usage budget pools and SSO.
FAQ
Yes. Baz acts on the PRs and tickets you bring it. Hyrax audits the whole codebase proactively and ships verified fixes. Many teams run both.
Yes — both ship fixes. The difference is scope: Baz is PR- and ticket-scoped, while Hyrax discovers issues across the entire codebase before they reach a PR, with SAST-grade source scanning built in.
Baz Technologies was founded by Guy Eisenkot and Nimrod Kor (previously Bridgecrew). Baz is SOC 2 certified and runs its agents on Amazon Bedrock, as does Hyrax.
Connect a repository and get the first full audit in under 10 minutes.
Start free