Skip to main content

Baz vs Hyrax

Baz fixes what you flag.
Hyrax finds it first.

Baz runs reviewer and fixer agents that act on the pull requests and tickets you bring it. Hyrax audits the entire codebase proactively, surfacing issues before they reach a PR, and ships fixes through 13-step verification.

Hyrax runs on roughly 400 of our own repositories.

Free plan: full access, up to 100 PR reviews a month for free, a $30 starter credit, and $10/month ongoing.

100%of findings resolved
13verification steps
$0to start, credits included
hyrax/fix-session-timeout
Merge-ready

[Hyrax] Fix: refresh session token before expiry

hyrax-bot wants to merge · +24 −6

13 / 13 checks passed
Baseline test written
Type check
Unit + integration tests
Post-fix audit clean
CI pipeline confirmed
Closed HYRAX-214 · verified end-to-end, no Baz handoff
Isolated jobs, scoped keys
Inference on AWS Bedrock
Code never used for training
13-step verification
A human merges every pull request

The difference

Same surface area. Hyrax does the work.

Baz
  • Reviewer + fixer agents that act on PRs and tickets
  • Reacts to issues you bring it: PR-scoped, not codebase-wide
  • No standalone SAST, SCA, or full-repo audit
  • Per-active-developer pricing with metered fixer usage
Hyrax
  • Proactively audits the whole codebase, before a PR exists
  • SAST-grade source scanning across six audit domains
  • 13-step verification with baseline tests before every fix
  • Compute credits included on every plan

Feature comparison

Everything Baz does, plus the execution it doesn't.

Capability
Baz
Hyrax
DetectionPR review comments
Codebase-wide audit
SAST-grade source scanning
ExecutionAutonomous fix execution
Writes baseline tests first
ContinuousProactive issue discovery
PricingCompute credits included
Yes
Partial
No

The edge Baz misses

A fix isn't done until it's verified.

Baz stops at a suggestion or a scoped patch. Every Hyrax fix runs a 13-step verification before it can merge. Baseline tests are established first, the fix is applied, and the full pipeline confirms nothing else broke. Nothing ships on trust.

13steps per fix
0unverified merges
01Isolated worktree
02Baseline tests
03Fix agent (convention-matched)
04Diff size guard (20 files / 2,000 lines)
05Test regression
06Build
07Auto-format
08Lint
09Cross-project test
10Scanner loop (scans its own fix)
11Review loop (second agent)
12Post-fix audit
13Pull request created

Pricing

Transparent pricing. Compute included.

Baz
$30/dev/mo

Per active developer. Free tier: 50 PR reviews. Fixer usage metered; Enterprise adds usage budget pools and SSO.

Hyrax
FreeFull access, $30 starter credit, $10/month ongoing. No card.
$0/mo
PaidEach paid user gets $30/month of credits.
$30/user/mo
  • Usage included each cycle
  • Whole-codebase audit, not just PRs
  • Autonomous verified fixes

FAQ

Questions about switching from Baz.

Yes. Baz acts on the PRs and tickets you bring it. Hyrax audits the whole codebase proactively and ships verified fixes. Many teams run both.

Yes, both ship fixes. The difference is scope: Baz is PR- and ticket-scoped, while Hyrax discovers issues across the entire codebase before they reach a PR, with SAST-grade source scanning built in.

Baz Technologies was founded by Guy Eisenkot and Nimrod Kor (previously Bridgecrew). Baz is SOC 2 certified and runs its agents on Amazon Bedrock, as does Hyrax.

Stop reviewing. Start shipping.

Connect a repository and get the first full audit in under 10 minutes.

No credit card to start
First audit in under 10 minutes
Code is never trained on
You approve every merge